Skip to main content

Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge, Court of Appeals of Maryland

Title Date Decided Ruling
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. FINEBLUM April 26, 2021 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. KAREMBELAS April 1, 2021 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. YOUNG, Celio March 31, 2021 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BAH April 10, 2020 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. AMBE [AMBE II] October 21, 2019 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. EDWARDS February 26, 2019 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. LANG & FALUSI August 16, 2018 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. TY CLEVENGER June 21, 2018 Other Rulings
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BUTLER October 23, 2017 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BELLAMY June 21, 2017 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. SWEITZER February 22, 2017 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. PHILLIPS February 22, 2017 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. FRAMM August 24, 2016 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. MITCHELL November 24, 2015 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. YOUNG October 20, 2015 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. ADAMS, Scott February 5, 2015 Reprimand
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BRIGERMAN December 18, 2014 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. KUM October 28, 2014 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. GELB October 22, 2014 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. AGBAJE May 19, 2014 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. LANDAU April 21, 2014 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. FRIEDMAN March 24, 2014 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BOCCHINO November 25, 2013 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. COLTON-BELL September 26, 2013 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. GERACE August 19, 2013 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. KOBIN July 8, 2013 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. ALSTON September 25, 2012 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. TANKO II May 23, 2012 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. MCGLADE April 24, 2012 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BRADY October 25, 2011 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. PATTERSON September 21, 2011 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. KEINER August 19, 2011 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. ZODROW April 27, 2011 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. FOX December 20, 2010 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. ROBATON November 16, 2009 Suspension
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. JAROSINSKI November 16, 2009 Disbarment
UNNAMED ATTORNEY v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N July 21, 2009 Other Rulings
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. BYRD April 14, 2009 Disbarment
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. PAWLAK April 14, 2009 Suspension
Attorney Grievance defense attorney specializes in defending lawyers in disciplinary proceedings before the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and the D.C. Bar's Board on Professional Responsibility involving professional misconduct, legal ethics, disbarment, suspensions of law licenses, petitions for disciplinary action, reprimands and sanctions for unethical conduct. If you receive a letter from Bar Counsel Lydia Lawless, Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, or from any attorney disciplinary board in Maryland or the District of Columbia, retain experienced attorneys with expertise in lawyer discipline and breach of ethics cases to avoid sanctions for professional misconduct. We help lawyers avoid disbarment, suspension, reprimands, censure and informal admonitions by drafting responses to client grievances and ethical complaints; representing lawyers in peer reviews, evidentiary hearings, and oral arguments before the BPR and the Court of Appeals; filing petitions to reinstate an attorney's license to practice law; conducting law firm ethical compliance audits; and drafting legal ethics opinions to protect lawyers from ethics charges. In many cases, disciplinary proceedings may be dismissed, dismissed with a warning, or result in a conditional diversion agreement with Bar Counsel to rectify misconduct. Lawyers may need help in managing their law firm attorney escrow IOLTA trust account and complying with attorney trust accounting rules to avoid charges of ethical misconduct. Do not represent yourself in responding to an attorney grievance, law firm client complaint, or other allegation of ethical impropriety. Attorney grievance defense counsel may help you comply with legal ethics rules, avoid sanctions like suspension or disbarment, and avoid future attorney grievances.

410.581.0070
By The Lawyer's Lawyers | Kramer & Connolly and Irwin R. Kramer who are responsible for the content of this informational website.   This website is designed for lawyers faced with attorney grievances. As cases do differ, past performance does not guarantee future results.
 

NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
OR THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE D.C. BAR