About the Author

Judge Raker

Judge Raker

Retired Judge, Court of Appeals of Maryland

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. HENSLEY

Issue: What sanction should the Court impose upon an attorney who failed to appear at client meetings and court hearings, concealed his absences, failed to respond to two clients' efforts to contact him, failed to return fees for which he performed no service, failed to deposit a client retainer into trust, failed to advise a medical provider about the receipt of settlement funds or to distribute its portion, abandoned a client's case, misrepresented where he was licensed to practice, and disregarded Bar Counsel's request for information and documentation?

Holding: Beyond his numerous infractions, Respondent failed to participate in any part of this disciplinary proceeding, presented no mitigating factors and exhibited dishonest and selfish motives, a pattern of misconduct and an indifference to making restitution that made disbarment the appropriate sanction.

Alleged Violations: Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct Rules ("MARPC")19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-301.4, 19-301.5(a), 19-301.15(a) and (d), 19-301.16(d), 19-308.1(b), and 19-308.4(a), (c), and (d), and Section 10-306 of the Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Article.

Citation: Misc. Docket AG No. 65

  • Decided on .
Attorney Grievance defense attorney specializes in defending lawyers in disciplinary proceedings before the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and the D.C. Bar's Board on Professional Responsibility involving professional misconduct, legal ethics, disbarment, suspensions of law licenses, petitions for disciplinary action, reprimands and sanctions for unethical conduct. If you receive a letter from Bar Counsel Lydia Lawless, Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, or from any attorney disciplinary board in Maryland or the District of Columbia, retain experienced attorneys with expertise in lawyer discipline and breach of ethics cases to avoid sanctions for professional misconduct. We help lawyers avoid disbarment, suspension, reprimands, censure and informal admonitions by drafting responses to client grievances and ethical complaints; representing lawyers in peer reviews, evidentiary hearings, and oral arguments before the BPR and the Court of Appeals; filing petitions to reinstate an attorney's license to practice law; conducting law firm ethical compliance audits; and drafting legal ethics opinions to protect lawyers from ethics charges. In many cases, disciplinary proceedings may be dismissed, dismissed with a warning, or result in a conditional diversion agreement with Bar Counsel to rectify misconduct. Lawyers may need help in managing their law firm attorney escrow IOLTA trust account and complying with attorney trust accounting rules to avoid charges of ethical misconduct. Do not represent yourself in responding to an attorney grievance, law firm client complaint, or other allegation of ethical impropriety. Attorney grievance defense counsel may help you comply with legal ethics rules, avoid sanctions like suspension or disbarment, and avoid future attorney grievances.

410.581.0070

By The Lawyer's Lawyers | Kramer & Connolly and Irwin R. Kramer who are responsible for the content of this informational website.   This website is designed for lawyers faced with attorney grievances. As cases do differ, past performance does not guarantee future results.
 

NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
OR THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE D.C. BAR