About the Author

Robert N. McDonald

Robert N. McDonald

Judge, Court of Appeals of Maryland

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM'N v. HARMON [Harmon II]

Issue: What sanction should be imposed upon an attorney who violated various provisions of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct coupled with a failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities?

Holding: Given the attorney's prior disciplinary history, his apparent inability to appreciate the seriousness of his misconduct, the absence of mitigating circumstances, and the existence of aggravating factors, the Court imposed an indefinite suspension in this case.  This was the second suspension imposed upon this lawyer in a three-month period.

UPDATE: This attorney was subsequently disbarred by consent on July 24, 2014.

Alleged Violations: Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct  1.3 (duty to act with reasonable diligence and promptness), 1.4 (duty to inform and consult with client and comply with requests for information), 1.5(a) (prohibition against unreasonable fees), 1.15 (duty to keep safe funds of clients or third parties), 8.1(b) (duty to respond to lawful demand for information from disciplinary authority), and 8.4(d) (prohibition against conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).

Citation: 435 Md. 306, 77 A.3d 1107 (2013)

  • Decided on .
Attorney Grievance defense attorney specializes in defending lawyers in disciplinary proceedings before the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and the D.C. Bar's Board on Professional Responsibility involving professional misconduct, legal ethics, disbarment, suspensions of law licenses, petitions for disciplinary action, reprimands and sanctions for unethical conduct. If you receive a letter from Bar Counsel Lydia Lawless, Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, or from any attorney disciplinary board in Maryland or the District of Columbia, retain experienced attorneys with expertise in lawyer discipline and breach of ethics cases to avoid sanctions for professional misconduct. We help lawyers avoid disbarment, suspension, reprimands, censure and informal admonitions by drafting responses to client grievances and ethical complaints; representing lawyers in peer reviews, evidentiary hearings, and oral arguments before the BPR and the Court of Appeals; filing petitions to reinstate an attorney's license to practice law; conducting law firm ethical compliance audits; and drafting legal ethics opinions to protect lawyers from ethics charges. In many cases, disciplinary proceedings may be dismissed, dismissed with a warning, or result in a conditional diversion agreement with Bar Counsel to rectify misconduct. Lawyers may need help in managing their law firm attorney escrow IOLTA trust account and complying with attorney trust accounting rules to avoid charges of ethical misconduct. Do not represent yourself in responding to an attorney grievance, law firm client complaint, or other allegation of ethical impropriety. Attorney grievance defense counsel may help you comply with legal ethics rules, avoid sanctions like suspension or disbarment, and avoid future attorney grievances.

410.581.0070

By The Lawyer's Lawyers | Kramer & Connolly and Irwin R. Kramer who are responsible for the content of this informational website.   This website is designed for lawyers faced with attorney grievances. As cases do differ, past performance does not guarantee future results.
 

NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
OR THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE D.C. BAR