Skip to main content

The Lawyer's Lawyer

Lawyers Helping Lawyers Avoid the Perils of Professional Discipline

Affording Justice

Q. Every week, consumers and business owners call me with cases that aren't large enough to justify my fees. I hate turning them away. But what's the alternative?

This question reveals a significant shortcoming in a legal system which has grown beyond the reach of many who seek access to justice.

Once a problem which fell below the poverty line, the skyrocketing cost of legal services has squeezed out the middle class as well. As attorneys' fees rival the value of their cases, many segments of society have been forced to fend for themselves, or simply give up.

Rather than expand the delivery of legal services to meet their needs, lawyers have criminalized those who could provide limited services at a much lower cost. Under the guise of protecting the public, we protect our turf through "ethical rules" which require the services of fully-licensed lawyers and deter anyone from disrupting our monopoly.

In an industry that fails to serve those who need it the most, perhaps we should rethink these antiquated restrictions and disrupt it even more. Instead of pretending that this problem may be solved with the pro bono service of lawyers lacking any economic incentive to do so, this article proposes a paradigm shift which would:

✓ License non-lawyers to deliver more affordable assistance in certain areas;

✓ Promote interdisciplinary solutions to client problems;

✓ Repeal economic restrictions disguised as "ethical" rules; and

✓ Open access through technology.


Ethics on Vacation
A Chat with GPT
 
Attorney Grievance defense attorney specializes in defending lawyers in disciplinary proceedings before the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and the D.C. Bar's Board on Professional Responsibility involving professional misconduct, legal ethics, disbarment, suspensions of law licenses, petitions for disciplinary action, reprimands and sanctions for unethical conduct. If you receive a letter from Bar Counsel Lydia Lawless, Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, or from any attorney disciplinary board in Maryland or the District of Columbia, retain experienced attorneys with expertise in lawyer discipline and breach of ethics cases to avoid sanctions for professional misconduct. We help lawyers avoid disbarment, suspension, reprimands, censure and informal admonitions by drafting responses to client grievances and ethical complaints; representing lawyers in peer reviews, evidentiary hearings, and oral arguments before the BPR and the Court of Appeals; filing petitions to reinstate an attorney's license to practice law; conducting law firm ethical compliance audits; and drafting legal ethics opinions to protect lawyers from ethics charges. In many cases, disciplinary proceedings may be dismissed, dismissed with a warning, or result in a conditional diversion agreement with Bar Counsel to rectify misconduct. Lawyers may need help in managing their law firm attorney escrow IOLTA trust account and complying with attorney trust accounting rules to avoid charges of ethical misconduct. Do not represent yourself in responding to an attorney grievance, law firm client complaint, or other allegation of ethical impropriety. Attorney grievance defense counsel may help you comply with legal ethics rules, avoid sanctions like suspension or disbarment, and avoid future attorney grievances.

410.581.0070

By The Lawyer's Lawyers | Kramer & Connolly and Irwin R. Kramer who are responsible for the content of this informational website.   This website is designed for lawyers faced with attorney grievances. As cases do differ, past performance does not guarantee future results.
 

NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
OR THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE D.C. BAR